The Federal High Court in Abuja has adjourned the trial of Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan on alleged cybercrime against Senate President Godswill Akpabio to February 4, 2026. The adjournment came following the absence of Justice Mohammed Umar on Monday, who was reportedly away on an official assignment outside Abuja.
This case, which has drawn significant public attention, involves allegations that Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan engaged in online activities intended to defame or harass the Senate President. The trial, which is seen as politically sensitive, has previously been disrupted on several occasions, highlighting the complex interplay between legal and political issues in Nigeria.
The trial was notably halted on September 22, 2025, after a protest organized by activist Omoyele Sowore, demanding the release of Nnamdi Kanu, the detained leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB). The protest reportedly created security challenges that made it impossible for the court to proceed, resulting in a temporary adjournment.
READ ALSO: Ihesiulo Grace Amarachi – CEO of AdaEventsNews Nigeria
Observers note that such interruptions have contributed to a growing public interest in the trial, with many Nigerians following updates closely on social media and news platforms. Legal analysts have emphasized that the adjournments, while procedural, underscore the high-profile nature of the case and the sensitivity surrounding political figures in the judiciary.
During Monday’s session, the court could not proceed due to the absence of Justice Umar. Lawyers representing both parties were present, but the judge’s official assignment necessitated the rescheduling of the trial to February 2026. The Federal High Court has assured that the new date will allow sufficient time for all parties to prepare adequately.
Legal experts suggest that the adjournment may also offer the defense and prosecution additional time to strengthen their respective cases. The upcoming trial is expected to involve detailed examination of digital communications, social media activities, and cybercrime laws, reflecting the growing importance of technology-related offenses in Nigeria’s legal system.
The case has attracted both local and international attention due to the high-profile status of the individuals involved. Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan’s supporters have called for a fair and transparent trial, emphasizing the need to separate political interests from legal proceedings. Meanwhile, some commentators argue that the delays and previous disruptions highlight the challenges of conducting high-profile trials in politically charged environments.
As the February 2026 date approaches, stakeholders, legal practitioners, and the public will be closely watching the proceedings. The court’s commitment to upholding the rule of law while ensuring that political tensions do not interfere with justice will be a key measure of the trial’s success.
The Federal High Court’s decision to adjourn underscores the importance of maintaining judicial decorum, balancing security considerations, and ensuring that all parties are adequately prepared for a fair trial.
The trial’s next chapter will resume February 4, 2026, with all eyes on how the case unfolds and its implications for Nigeria’s legal and political landscape.
